Understanding Severity vs. Priority

As a software tester, one of the most essential skills you’ll develop is the ability to distinguish between Severity and Priority when logging defects. Knowing how to assess and articulate both concepts ensures that bugs are fixed in the right order and with the appropriate level of urgency.

Let’s dive into each term and explore how to distinguish between them effectively.


What is Severity?

Severity refers to the technical impact of a defect on the product’s functionality. In simple terms, it’s all about how severely the defect affects the application and its features. The higher the severity, the more critical the issue is to the system’s core functionality.

Common Severity Levels:

  • Critical Severity: The application crashes, or essential features become completely unavailable. Think of a 500 error that stops users from completing their journey.
  • Major Severity: A significant issue that disrupts functionality, but the application is still usable. For example, a key feature is broken, but the system remains operational.
  • Minor Severity: The defect doesn’t majorly impact functionality but still causes some inconvenience. This could be something like a UI glitch or a typo in a non-essential part of the interface.
  • Trivial Severity: A cosmetic or low-impact issue that doesn’t affect the user experience or system functionality. For example, a misplaced icon or slight color inconsistency.

As testers, our natural inclination is to want everything fixed as soon as we report it, especially the more critical issues. However, we don’t make the call on when or how to fix defects. Our role is to document the behavior of the application and highlight the associated risks. We provide clarity, but it’s up to stakeholders to determine the appropriate course of action.

What is Priority?

Priority, on the other hand, is all about urgency—the business needs and how quickly a defect must be addressed. The priority of an issue is often determined by its customer impact and its potential to affect the product’s success in the market.

For example, that high-severity 500 error might prevent users from completing their tasks, but if it's a rare edge case that most users won’t encounter, it could be lower in priority. On the other hand, a low-severity typo on the company’s main landing page could have a huge impact on conversions, even though it doesn’t affect core functionality.

So, which one will likely be fixed first? You guessed it—the typo! Prioritization isn't always about fixing the most "severe" bugs first; it's about addressing the issues that matter most to the business right now.

Common Priority Levels:

  • High Priority: Urgent issues that must be resolved immediately to meet a critical deadline, customer need, or business goal. These might include bugs that block releases or impact core customer workflows.
  • Medium Priority: Defects that should be addressed soon but aren't immediately urgent. These might be issues that affect functionality but don’t have a major business impact.
  • Low Priority: Defects that can be fixed later, with little to no immediate effect on the timeline or business outcomes. These might be cosmetic issues or minor annoyances.

Sometimes, the combination of severity and priority determines whether a defect is classified as a "hotfix" — meaning it needs to be deployed as soon as possible, often outside of the normal release cycle. We’ll explore hotfixes in a future post, so stay tuned!

Why You Should Expect Changes in Severity or Priority

It’s important to remember that both severity and priority can be revised after the initial bug report. Stakeholders or developers may have more context that can change the defect’s classification:

  • A developer might have deeper insights into the issue and could determine that what seemed like a minor bug is actually a security vulnerability—which would increase the severity.
  • A product owner might decide that a feature affecting usability, even if technically minor, is now a top priority due to customer feedback or business needs.

If someone challenges your initial assessment, don’t take it personally. Collaborating and discussing the defect’s severity and priority is a natural part of the testing process. After all, the ultimate goal is to ensure the most impactful issues are addressed first—whether that’s technical or business-driven.

Conclusion

To wrap up, understanding the difference between Severity and Priority is crucial for a software tester. While severity is about how much a defect impacts the functionality of the product, priority focuses on the urgency with which it needs to be fixed, based on business goals and user needs.

By accurately categorizing defects, you help your team focus on the right issues at the right time—leading to a better product and smoother releases. And remember: while you’re responsible for identifying and reporting issues, the final decision on their resolution lies with your stakeholders.

Have you encountered any challenges in differentiating severity and priority on your team? Share your experiences in the comments below!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding HTTP Response Status Codes

Image
As a quality assurance professional, understanding HTTP response codes is essential, especially when testing APIs or web applications . These codes provide vital information about the status of requests, helping you identify issues quickly. In this post, we’ll break down what each response code means, why it matters, and how you can use it for effective testing. HTTP response codes are divided into five categories: informational, success, redirection, client error, and server error. While there are many codes in each category, the most common ones you'll encounter are 200 , 404 , and 500 . 1xx – Informational Responses You’ll rarely encounter these during typical testing, unless you're working with proxy servers or handling long-running requests . These responses simply indicate that the server has received the request and is processing it. 100 : Continue — The server has received the request headers, and the client should proceed with sending the request body. 101 : Switchi...
Read more

API Testing Overview

Image
When you're new to API testing, it can seem like a very foreign concept. In reality, it is very similar to testing any application. We'll look at some general categories to cover, and what types of tests those might include. Functionality Functionality tests are of course a major part of any test plan. In API functionality testing we check for things like a correct Response, the correct Response Code, and Schema Validation. You'll want to validate these for each endpoint you're working with, as well as for each type of request available. Security For the most part, APIs are typically internal tools and you'll want to protect the data from being accessed by outsiders. While security testing APIs we check for authentication and authorization methods, unauthorized access, and injection attacks. Performance At the most basic level, performance testing an API involves checking that the response time in within limits. This can be further fleshed out while the API is under...
Read more

Testing vs. Checking

Image
In software quality assurance, the terms testing and checking are often used interchangeably, but they actually refer to two distinct activities. While both are essential in ensuring the quality of a product, they serve different purposes. Let’s break down the differences and explore some common methods used for each. What’s the Difference? Testing is an in-depth process used to explore and assess the behavior of a system under various conditions. It’s about learning and discovering how the product performs, often revealing unexpected issues or areas for improvement. Checking , on the other hand, is a more straightforward process. It focuses on confirming that the system meets predefined expectations or requirements. It’s about verifying whether specific functions or features are working as they should. Key Differences Purpose: Testing: Aims to identify problems by exploring the system in various scenarios. It’s used to find defects, unexpected behaviors, or gaps in functionali...
Read more